Compute the consistency score per the method of Kirby et al. (1999, doi:10.1037//0096-3445.128.1.78 ). This is described in detail in Kaplan et al. (2016, doi:10.1007/s40614-016-0070-9 ), where it's suggested that a consistency score below 0.75 might be a sign of inattentive responding.
Usage
kirby_consistency(
data,
discount_function = c("hyperbolic", "exponential", "power")
)Arguments
- data
Responses to score.
- discount_function
Should \(k\) values be computed according to the hyperbolic, exponential, or power discount function? The original method uses the hyperbolic, but in principle the exponential and power are also possible (though these should be considered experimental features).
Examples
if (FALSE) { # \dontrun{
data("td_bc_single_ptpt")
mod <- kirby_consistency(td_bc_single_ptpt)
} # }